in Re: Michael Kennedy
This text of in Re: Michael Kennedy (in Re: Michael Kennedy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 12-05-00064-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
TYLER, TEXAS
§
IN RE: MICHAEL KENNEDY, § ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
RELATOR
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
Michael Kennedy filed a petition for writ of mandamus to compel the trial court to rule on his motion for nunc pro tunc filed on February 7, 2004. The trial court has now ruled on Kennedy’s motion, thereby rendering Kennedy’s mandamus petition moot. Accordingly, we do not reach the merits of his petition. The relief requested in the petition for writ of mandamus is denied as moot.
Opinion delivered March 16, 2005.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and DeVasto, J.
(PUBLISH)
COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS
JUDGMENT
MARCH 16, 2005
IN RE: MICHAEL KENNEDY,
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
ON THIS DAY came to be heard the petition for writ of mandamus filed by Michael Kennedy, who is the Relator, pending on the docket of the 349th Judicial District Court of Anderson County, Texas. Said petition for writ of mandamus having been filed herein on March 14, 2005, and the same having been duly considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that a Writ of Mandamus Should Not Issue, it is therefore CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the said petition for writ of mandamus be, and the same is, hereby Denied as Moot.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and DeVasto, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Michael Kennedy, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-michael-kennedy-texapp-2005.