In re Michael Jerome B.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Michael Jerome B.

259 A.D.2d 408, 685 N.Y.S.2d 613, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3032

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 25, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 259 A.D.2d 408 (In re Michael Jerome B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Michael Jerome B., 259 A.D.2d 408, 685 N.Y.S.2d 613, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3032 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

Orders of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Mary [409]*409Bednar, J.), entered on or about May 15, 1996, which, upon a finding of permanent neglect, terminated respondent mother’s parental rights to her sons Gregory and Michael and, to the extent appealed from as limited by appellant’s brief, denied appellant-intervenor’s application for custody of the subject children and instead transferred custody of the children to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for purposes of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The testimony and records adduced at the dispositional hearing sufficiently support Family Court’s determination that it is in the best interests of the subject children to remain with their current foster mother (see, Matter of Shavone La’Vette C., 194 AD2d 417, lv denied 82 NY2d 657). Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Sullivan, Lerner and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Orders of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Mary [409]*409Bednar, J.), entered on or about May 15, 1996, which, upon a finding of permanent neglect, terminated respondent mother’s parental rights to her sons Gregory and Michael and, to the extent appealed from as limited by appellant’s brief, denied appellant-intervenor’s application for custody of the subject children and instead transferred custody of the children to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for purposes of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The testimony and records adduced at the dispositional hearing sufficiently support Family Court’s determination that it is in the best interests of the subject children to remain with their current foster mother (see, Matter of Shavone La’Vette C., 194 AD2d 417, lv denied 82 NY2d 657). Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Sullivan, Lerner and Rubin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 A.D.2d 408, 685 N.Y.S.2d 613, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3032, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-michael-jerome-b-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack