In re Michael J.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Michael J.

267 A.D.2d 126, 699 N.Y.S.2d 284, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13032

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 16, 1999

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 267 A.D.2d 126 (In re Michael J.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Michael J., 267 A.D.2d 126, 699 N.Y.S.2d 284, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13032 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Richard Ross, J.), entered on or about April 15, 1996, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon his admission that he committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of sexual abuse in the first degree, and placed him in a limited secure facility with the Division for Youth for up to 13 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court elicited a sufficient factual basis for appellant’s admission (see, Family Ct Act § 321.3 [1] [a]; Matter of David V., 226 AD2d 319). In this context, the forcible kissing of the victim in her mouth constituted sexual abuse in the first degree. Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Tom, Rubin, Andrias and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Richard Ross, J.), entered on or about April 15, 1996, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon his admission that he committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of sexual abuse in the first degree, and placed him in a limited secure facility with the Division for Youth for up to 13 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court elicited a sufficient factual basis for appellant’s admission (see, Family Ct Act § 321.3 [1] [a]; Matter of David V., 226 AD2d 319). In this context, the forcible kissing of the victim in her mouth constituted sexual abuse in the first degree. Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Tom, Rubin, Andrias and Buckley, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

267 A.D.2d 126, 699 N.Y.S.2d 284, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13032, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-michael-j-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack