in Re: Michael Hooper & Associates, P.C.
This text of in Re: Michael Hooper & Associates, P.C. (in Re: Michael Hooper & Associates, P.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
______________________________
No. 06-09-00091-CV ______________________________
IN RE: MICHAEL HOOPER & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
Original Mandamus Proceeding
Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss MEMORANDUM OPINION
Michael Hooper & Associates, P.C., has filed a petition asking this Court to issue a writ of
mandamus against the Honorable John Ovard, Administrative Judge of the First Administrative
Region, in Dallas, Texas. In the petition, Relator complains that mandamus should issue because
Ovard did not hold a hearing on Relator's motion to recuse a district judge.
This Court has jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against "a judge of a district or county
court in the court of appeals district." TEX . GOV 'T CODE ANN . § 22.221(b) (Vernon 2004). Dallas
County is not within this court-of-appeals district, and Ovard is not a judge of a district or county
court within this district. See TEX . GOV 'T CODE ANN . § 22.201(g) (Vernon 2004). We have no
jurisdiction over this petition.
We deny the petition for writ of mandamus.
Josh R. Morriss, III Chief Justice
Date Submitted: October 7, 2009 Date Decided: October 8, 2009
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Michael Hooper & Associates, P.C., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-michael-hooper-associates-pc-texapp-2009.