In re Michael H.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Michael H.

99 A.D.3d 1258, 951 N.Y.2d 458

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 5, 2012·Published

Opinion

Memorandum: On appeal from an order that adjudicated him to be a juvenile delinquent and placed him on probation for a term of six months, respondent contends only that, by imposing a term of probation and issuing an order of protection, Family Court failed to adopt the “least restrictive available alternative” as required by Family Court Act § 352.2 (2) (a). Inasmuch as the term of probation and order of protection issued by the court have expired, this appeal is moot (see Matter of Alex N., 255 AD2d 626, 627 [1998]). Present — Scudder, EJ., Smith, Fahey, Lindley and Martoche, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum: On appeal from an order that adjudicated him to be a juvenile delinquent and placed him on probation for a term of six months, respondent contends only that, by imposing a term of probation and issuing an order of protection, Family Court failed to adopt the “least restrictive available alternative” as required by Family Court Act § 352.2 (2) (a). Inasmuch as the term of probation and order of protection issued by the court have expired, this appeal is moot (see Matter of Alex N., 255 AD2d 626, 627 [1998]). Present — Scudder, EJ., Smith, Fahey, Lindley and Martoche, JJ.

In re Michael H., 99 A.D.3d 1258, 951 N.Y.2d 458 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

99 A.D.3d 1258 (In re Michael H.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related