Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re Michael H.

In re Michael H.

99 A.D.3d 1258, 951 N.Y.2d 458
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 5, 2012
StatusPublished

This text of 99 A.D.3d 1258 (In re Michael H.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Michael H., 99 A.D.3d 1258, 951 N.Y.2d 458 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

Memorandum: On appeal from an order that adjudicated him to be a juvenile delinquent and placed him on probation for a term of six months, respondent contends only that, by imposing a term of probation and issuing an order of protection, Family Court failed to adopt the “least restrictive available alternative” as required by Family Court Act § 352.2 (2) (a). Inasmuch as the term of probation and order of protection issued by the court have expired, this appeal is moot (see Matter of Alex N., 255 AD2d 626, 627 [1998]). Present — Scudder, EJ., Smith, Fahey, Lindley and Martoche, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Alex N.
255 A.D.2d 626 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 A.D.3d 1258, 951 N.Y.2d 458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-michael-h-nyappdiv-2012.