in Re Michael Gomez
This text of in Re Michael Gomez (in Re Michael Gomez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
i i i i i i
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-08-00611-CR
IN RE Michael GOMEZ
Original Mandamus Proceeding1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice
Delivered and Filed: September 17, 2008
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DISMISSED
On August 13, 2008, relator Michael Gomez filed a petition for writ of mandamus, seeking
to compel the trial court to correct the judgment in the underlying criminal matter to reflect
additional presentence jail time credit. On August 21, 2008, this court requested the State file a
response to relator’s petition.
On September 5, 2008, the State filed a response, agreeing that relator is entitled to
additional presentence jail time credit. The State further informed this Court that the trial court
issued a Judgment Nunc Pro Tunc on September 4, 2008. The judgment states, “It appears to the
Court that the order entered in the above entitled cause on November 14, 2006 is incorrect as it
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 97-09-0208-CRA, filed in the 218th Judicial District Court, Atascosa County, Texas, the Honorable Stella H. Saxon presiding. However, the challenged order was signed by the Honorable Donna Rayes, presiding judge of the 81st Judicial District Court, Atascosa County, Texas. 04-08-00623-CR
appears on the minutes of the Court . . . . It further appears that the foregoing omission occurred
because of an oversight.” The judgment then orders that the original judgment reflect the following
time to be credited to relator’s sentence: July 29, 1997 to August 12, 1997; July 12, 2003 to October
24, 2003; December 29, 2003 to December 30, 2003; and December 20, 2005 to October 26, 2006.
Because relator has been granted the relief he sought, his petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed
as moot.
DO NOT PUBLISH
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Michael Gomez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-michael-gomez-texapp-2008.