in Re: Michael Easton
This text of in Re: Michael Easton (in Re: Michael Easton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dissenting Opinion of August 10, 2006, Withdrawn and Corrected Dissenting Opinion filed August 10, 2006.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-06-00674-CV
IN RE MICHAEL EASTON, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
C O R R E C T E D D I S S E N T I N G O P I N I O N
I withdraw my dissenting opinion of August 10, 2006 and issue this corrected opinion.
Consistent with our original and supplemental opinions in In re Whatley, 2006 WL 1490161 (Tex. App.CHouston [14th Dist.] 2006, orig. proceeding), Judge Wood was required to recuse himself or request assignment of another judge in the case prior to taking any Afurther action in the case.@ See Tex. R. Civ. P. 18a(d). The order which is the subject of Judge Wood=s show cause proceeding was entered on February 7, 2006, during the pendency of the September 9, 2005, motion to recuse. The majority has drawn a fine line by implicitly concluding that Judge Wood was not taking Afurther action in the case@ when he signed the February 7, 2006 order.
I agree with the majority that Judge Wood has the power, inherent in his office, to deal with persons who disobey lawful orders. However, upon issuance of our original and supplemental opinions, the order sought to be enforced was rendered void. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent.
/s/ Charles Seymore
Justice
Corrected Dissenting Opinion filed August 10, 2006.
Panel consists of Justices Hudson, Frost, and Seymore. (Hudson, J. majority.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Michael Easton, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-michael-easton-texapp-2006.