in Re: Michael Davis
Opinion
Deny Writ and Opinion Filed July 11, 2013
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00821-CV No. 05-13-00823-CV No. 05-13-00824-CV No. 05-13-00825-CV No. 05-13-00826-CV No. 05-13-00827-CV
IN RE MICHAEL DAVIS, Relator
On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F99-99980, F99-99981, F99-99982, F99-99983, F99-99984 and F99-99985
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Francis, and Lewis Opinion by Justice Bridges Relator contends the trial court violated a ministerial duty by not ruling on his motion for
access to the trial record. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not
recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown he is
entitled to the relief requested. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a); Simon v. Levario, 306 S.W.3d 318,
320-21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relator=s petition for writ of mandamus.
/David L. Bridges/ DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE 130821F.P05
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re: Michael Davis (in Re: Michael Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.