In re Michael C.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

In re Michael C.

665 A.2d 608, 235 Conn. 912, 1995 Conn. LEXIS 367

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedSeptember 28, 1995

DocketSC 15318

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 665 A.2d 608 (In re Michael C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Michael C., 665 A.2d 608, 235 Conn. 912, 1995 Conn. LEXIS 367 (Colo. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 14685) is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Does General Statutes § 46b-127, as amended by § 6 (d) of No. 94-2 of the 1994 Public Acts, July Special Session, apply to the transfer from the juvenile docket to the adult docket in this case?

“2. If the answer to the first question is yes, does that application constitute an ex post facto law in violation [913]*913of either the federal or state constitution?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15318. Grace Cavero, deputy assistant public defender, and Christine Perra Rapillo, supervisory assistant public defender, in support of the petition. Francis J. Carino, chief state’s advocate, in opposition. Decided September 28, 1995

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 14685) is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Does General Statutes § 46b-127, as amended by § 6 (d) of No. 94-2 of the 1994 Public Acts, July Special Session, apply to the transfer from the juvenile docket to the adult docket in this case?

“2. If the answer to the first question is yes, does that application constitute an ex post facto law in violation [913]*913of either the federal or state constitution?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15318. Grace Cavero, deputy assistant public defender, and Christine Perra Rapillo, supervisory assistant public defender, in support of the petition. Francis J. Carino, chief state’s advocate, in opposition. Decided September 28, 1995

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

665 A.2d 608, 235 Conn. 912, 1995 Conn. LEXIS 367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-michael-c-conn-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack