In re Michael B.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Michael B.

266 A.D.2d 22, 696 N.Y.S.2d 821, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11161

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 4, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 266 A.D.2d 22 (In re Michael B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Michael B., 266 A.D.2d 22, 696 N.Y.S.2d 821, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11161 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Cira Martinez, J.), entered on or about March 24, 1998, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, [23]*23would constitute the crimes of robbery in the second degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, and placed him with the New York State Division for Youth, limited secure, for 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the court’s determinations concerning identification and credibility. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Williams, Tom, Mazzarelli and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Cira Martinez, J.), entered on or about March 24, 1998, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, [23]*23would constitute the crimes of robbery in the second degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, and placed him with the New York State Division for Youth, limited secure, for 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the court’s determinations concerning identification and credibility. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Williams, Tom, Mazzarelli and Saxe, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

266 A.D.2d 22, 696 N.Y.S.2d 821, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-michael-b-nyappdiv-1999.