In re Michael B.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Michael B.

208 A.D.2d 832, 618 N.Y.S.2d 565

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 24, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 208 A.D.2d 832 (In re Michael B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Michael B., 208 A.D.2d 832, 618 N.Y.S.2d 565 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Greenbaum, J.), dated April 6, 1992, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court, dated September 4, 1990, finding that the appellant had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle in the third degree, and upon a direction by the same court on November 20,1990, placing the appellant on probation for two years, and upon the appellant’s admission on December 12, 1991, that he had violated a condition of his probation by being truant from school, adjudged him to be a juvenile delinquent, and placed him with the Division of Youth, Title II for a period of one year.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the appellant’s counsel that there are no non-frivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Sullivan, J. P., Rosenblatt, Altman, Hart and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Greenbaum, J.), dated April 6, 1992, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court, dated September 4, 1990, finding that the appellant had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle in the third degree, and upon a direction by the same court on November 20,1990, placing the appellant on probation for two years, and upon the appellant’s admission on December 12, 1991, that he had violated a condition of his probation by being truant from school, adjudged him to be a juvenile delinquent, and placed him with the Division of Youth, Title II for a period of one year.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the appellant’s counsel that there are no non-frivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Sullivan, J. P., Rosenblatt, Altman, Hart and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

208 A.D.2d 832, 618 N.Y.S.2d 565, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-michael-b-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack