In Re: Michael A. Ruff v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re: Michael A. Ruff v. the State of Texas (In Re: Michael A. Ruff v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DENIED and Opinion Filed March 15, 2024
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-24-00298-CV
IN RE MICHAEL A. RUFF, Relator
Original Proceeding from the Probate Court No. 2 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. PR-11-02825-2
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Partida-Kipness, Nowell, and Miskel Opinion by Justice Partida-Kipness Before the Court is relator’s March 12, 2024 petition for writ of habeas corpus
or, alternatively, writ of mandamus and emergency motion for temporary relief. In
his petition, relator challenges a trial court’s writ of attachment commanding that
relator be taken into custody and delivered to jail for his failure to appear at a show-
cause hearing and to ensure his appearance at the next hearing. In his emergency
motion, relator seeks a stay of the writ of attachment and all proceedings related to
his contempt or incarceration pending this Court’s action on his petition.
After reviewing relator’s petition and the record before us, whether properly
construed as a writ of habeas corpus or a writ of mandamus, we conclude that relator has failed to demonstrate entitlement to relief. Accordingly, we deny the petition.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
We also deny as moot relator’s emergency motion.
/Robbie Partida-Kipness// 240298f.p05 ROBBIE PARTIDA-KIPNESS JUSTICE
–2–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re: Michael A. Ruff v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-michael-a-ruff-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.