in Re M.H. and K.H
This text of in Re M.H. and K.H (in Re M.H. and K.H) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Majority and Dissenting Opinions filed September 10, 2021.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-21-00459-CV
IN RE M.H. AND K.H, Relators
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 311th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2021-11726
MEMORANDUM MAJORITY OPINION
On August 18, 2021, relators K.H. (mother) and M.H (presumed father) filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this Court to compel the Honorable Frank Pierce, presiding judge of the 311th District Court of Harris County, to vacate its order dated June 9, 2021, granting Jonathan Hersh’s motion and ordering genetic testing of relators’ child, H.N.H. Relators have not established that they are entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus.
/s/ Randy Wilson Justice
Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Spain, and Wilson. (Spain, J., dissenting).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re M.H. and K.H, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mh-and-kh-texapp-2021.