In re Meyer

D.C. Circuit

In re Meyer

48 App. D.C. 580, 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 2357

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedMarch 31, 1919

DocketNo. 1206

StatusPublished

This text of 48 App. D.C. 580 (In re Meyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Meyer, 48 App. D.C. 580, 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 2357 (D.C. Cir. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The application [by Albert T. Meyer] for patent here in issue relates to a composition for furnace lining ■capable of withstanding a high degree of heat without being chemically affected in the reduction of ores.

The three tribunals below were unanimous in holding that ■the invention is anticipated by a patent issued to applicant in ■1915; hence, to allow the claims of the present application Would amount to double patenting.

The ruling is clearly supported by the record, and the de[581]*581cisión of the Commissioner of Patents is aflrmed, and the clerk is directed to certify these proceedings as by law required.

Affirmed.

A motion for rehearing was denied May 22, 1919.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI