In re Meurer

144 F. 445, 1906 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 259
CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 3, 1906
DocketNo. 2,281
StatusPublished

This text of 144 F. 445 (In re Meurer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Meurer, 144 F. 445, 1906 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 259 (E.D. Pa. 1906).

Opinion

J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.

The exception that the specification is not sworn to is well taken. Re Brown, 112 Fed. 49, 60 C. C. A. 118; Re Baerncopf (D. C.) 117 Fed. 975; Re Glass (D. C.) 119 Fed. 520. But the defect is amendable, and the objecting creditor is permitted to make the necessary affidavit within five days. To avoid further question — and without deciding that the signing by the creditor’s attorney is insufficient — the specification may also be signed by an officer of the bank, and this may be done within the same period.

The exception to the second objection as too vague is also well taken, and must be sustained.

After the specification of objection has been properly amended, the clerk will refer the matter to the referee for appropriate action and report;

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Brown
112 F. 49 (Fifth Circuit, 1901)
In re Baerncopf
117 F. 975 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1902)
In re Baber
119 F. 520 (E.D. Tennessee, 1902)
In re Boston Dry Goods Co.
125 F. 226 (First Circuit, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
144 F. 445, 1906 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-meurer-paed-1906.