in Re Metropolitan Transit Authority

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in in Re Metropolitan Transit Authority. Read the opinion of the Court — 334 S.W.3d 806
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 3, 2010·No. 01-10-00596-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued August 3, 2010 



In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas





NO. 01-10-00596-CV





IN RE METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Relator





Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus





MEMORANDUM OPINION


By petition for writ of mandamus, relator, Metropolitan Transit Authority, challenges the trial court’s April 8, 2010 order denying its plea to the jurisdiction.

We deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(k)(1)(A) (failure to provide in the appendix real party in interest, Sharon Wilson’s, appeal of the Texas Department of Insurance Division of Workers’ Compensation’s August 8, 2007 Decision and Order).

Per Curiam 

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Sharp.


Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Metropolitan Transit Authority, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

in Re Metropolitan Transit Authority (in Re Metropolitan Transit Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.