In Re Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

In Re Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.

315 S.W.3d 893, 2009 Tex. App. LEXIS 1059, 2009 WL 369486

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 17, 2009·No. 05-09-00098-CV·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Opinion by

Justice MAZZANT.

Relator contends the trial judge erred in refusing to stay the claims of one of the plaintiffs in the underlying case. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown that the trial court abused its discretion. See In re Prudential, 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex.2003); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839 (Tex.1992). Accordingly, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Opinion by

Justice MAZZANT.

Relator contends the trial judge erred in refusing to stay the claims of one of the plaintiffs in the underlying case. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown that the trial court abused its discretion. See In re Prudential, 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex.2003); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839 (Tex.1992). Accordingly, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

In Re Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 315 S.W.3d 893, 2009 Tex. App. LEXIS 1059, 2009 WL 369486 (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

315 S.W.3d 893 (In Re Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related