Home/Court of Appeals of Texas/In Re Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.

In Re Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.

315 S.W.3d 893, 2009 Tex. App. LEXIS 1059, 2009 WL 369486
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 17, 2009
Docket05-09-00098-CV
StatusPublished

This text of 315 S.W.3d 893 (In Re Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 315 S.W.3d 893, 2009 Tex. App. LEXIS 1059, 2009 WL 369486 (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Opinion by

Justice MAZZANT.

Relator contends the trial judge erred in refusing to stay the claims of one of the plaintiffs in the underlying case. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown that the trial court abused its discretion. See In re Prudential, 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex.2003); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839 (Tex.1992). Accordingly, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America
148 S.W.3d 124 (Texas Supreme Court, 2004)
Walker v. Packer
827 S.W.2d 833 (Texas Supreme Court, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
315 S.W.3d 893, 2009 Tex. App. LEXIS 1059, 2009 WL 369486, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-merrill-lynch-co-inc-texapp-2009.