In re Merrill & Baker
186 F. 312, 108 C.C.A. 390, 1911 U.S. App. LEXIS 4114
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided February 14, 1911·No. No. 142·Published·Cited by 11 cases
Opinion
The order is affirmed on the decision of the district judge. The difficulty with appellant’s careful and extended argument as to the relations of the parties is that the contracts of loan and the contracts of indemnity are all in writing, precisely expressed and free from any ambiguity.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Merrill & Baker, 186 F. 312, 108 C.C.A. 390, 1911 U.S. App. LEXIS 4114 (2d Cir. 1911).
186 F. 312 (In re Merrill & Baker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Ray Long & Richard R. Smith, Inc.
95 F.2d 525 (Second Circuit, 1938)
Mansur v. Edler
84 F.2d 342 (Ninth Circuit, 1936)
In re Lehrenkrauss
14 F. Supp. 682 (E.D. New York, 1936)
Miller v. Irving Trust Co.
296 U.S. 256 (Supreme Court, 1935)
Manhattan Properties, Inc. v. Irving Trust Co.
66 F.2d 470 (Second Circuit, 1933)
First Nat. Bank of Canton v. Irving Trust Co.
66 F.2d 485 (Second Circuit, 1933)
Brock's Assigned Estate (No. 2)
166 A. 782 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1933)
In re Wise Shoes, Inc.
2 F. Supp. 521 (S.D. New York, 1932)
Maynard v. Elliott
283 U.S. 273 (Supreme Court, 1931)
In re Adair Realty & Trust Co.
35 F.2d 531 (N.D. Georgia, 1929)
Bibb Mfg. Co. v. Pope
22 F.2d 557 (S.D. New York, 1925)