In re Merck

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

In re Merck

66 F. 724, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 3170

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

DecidedApril 26, 1894

StatusPublished

This text of 66 F. 724 (In re Merck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Merck, 66 F. 724, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 3170 (circtsdny 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

COXE, District Judge.

The questions involved in this appeal have all been determined in the Case of Battle & Co., 50 Fed. 402, affirmed 4 C. C. A. 249, 54 Fed. 141. There is some testimony here which was not present in the Battle Case, but the new evidence is cumulative in character and does not change in any degree the character of the propositions decided. I am clearly of the opinion that the decision of the court of appeals of the Eighth circuit should be followed by this court. The decision of the board is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COXE, District Judge.

The questions involved in this appeal have all been determined in the Case of Battle & Co., 50 Fed. 402, affirmed 4 C. C. A. 249, 54 Fed. 141. There is some testimony here which was not present in the Battle Case, but the new evidence is cumulative in character and does not change in any degree the character of the propositions decided. I am clearly of the opinion that the decision of the court of appeals of the Eighth circuit should be followed by this court. The decision of the board is reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

66 F. 724, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 3170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-merck-circtsdny-1894.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack