In re Mercer
This text of 117 Misc. 371 (In re Mercer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The decedent died June 27, 1919, a depositor in fourteen savings banks. On July 1, 1919, dividends were credited to the accounts standing in his name. The sums thus credited, though commonly so called, are not interest — which is compensation paid by a borrower of money to the lender for its use — and are not apportionable between principal and income. They are dividends derived from earnings, and are payable to the depositor only if declared by the trustees of the banks, and then only if the deposits are not withdrawn prior to the close of the period for which they are declared. In the case at bar this period closed June 30, 1919.
The right to participate in these dividend distributions did not accrue to the decedent in his lifetime, and when credited or paid after his death they form no part of the principal of his estate. They are the product or produce of his estate, arising during its administration, and are payable as income to those to whom by his will the testator bequeathed the income of the property of which he died possessed.
Settle decree accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
117 Misc. 371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mercer-nysurct-1921.