In re Mercer

171 F. 81, 96 C.C.A. 185, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4807
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided June 14, 1909·No. No. 98·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Western Implement Company, when it was adjudged a bankrupt, was indebted to the-state of Minnesota lor binder twine theretofore manufactured at the state prison and sold and delivered to the company conformably to the state laws, and in due course the state insisted that this debt should be accorded a priority in payment under clause 5 of section 64b of the bankruptcy act (Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, 30 Stat. 563 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3448]). The District Court, in a well-considered opinion, reported in 166 Fed., at page 576, sustained the state’s contention, and that ruling is now challenged by the trustees of the bankrupt’s estate. After carefully considering Hie matter, we have arrived at the same conclusion as did the District Court, and for the same reasons.

The ruling of that court is accordingly approved and confirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Mercer, 171 F. 81, 96 C.C.A. 185, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4807 (8th Cir. 1909).

171 F. 81 (In re Mercer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Newman
47 F.2d 1073 (D. Minnesota, 1931)
Wheeler v. Johnson
26 F.2d 455 (Eighth Circuit, 1928)
Rice v. State Ex Rel. Short
1924 OK 1112 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1924)
Davis v. Pringle
1 F.2d 860 (Fourth Circuit, 1924)
Courtney v. Fidelity Trust Co.
219 F. 57 (Sixth Circuit, 1914)
In re Devlin
180 F. 170 (D. Kansas, 1910)