In re Mercedez-Gonzalez

433 F. App'x 144
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 1, 2011·No. No. 10-1604·Published

Opinion

[145]*145Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bernardo Mercedez-Gonzalez petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion for sentence reduction. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court granted Mercedez-Gonzalez’s motion on January 4, 2011. Accordingly, because the district court recently granted the relief sought by Mercedez-Gonzalez, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Mercedez-Gonzalez, 433 F. App'x 144 (4th Cir. 2011).

433 F. App'x 144 (In re Mercedez-Gonzalez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.