In re: Mercedez-Gonzalez

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 1, 2011
Docket10-1604
StatusUnpublished

This text of In re: Mercedez-Gonzalez (In re: Mercedez-Gonzalez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re: Mercedez-Gonzalez, (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1604

In re: BERNARDO MERCEDEZ-GONZALEZ,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (6:96-cr-00258-JAB-1)

Submitted: March 18, 2011 Decided: June 1, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bernardo Mercedez-Gonzalez, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Bernardo Mercedez-Gonzalez petitions for a writ of

mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting

on his motion for sentence reduction. He seeks an order from

this court directing the district court to act. Our review of

the district court’s docket reveals that the district court

granted Mercedez-Gonzalez’s motion on January 4, 2011.

Accordingly, because the district court recently granted the

relief sought by Mercedez-Gonzalez, we deny the mandamus

petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In re: Mercedez-Gonzalez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mercedez-gonzalez-ca4-2011.