In re Mennie

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Mennie

805 A.2d 454, 174 N.J. 335, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 1290

DecidedSeptember 19, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 805 A.2d 454 (In re Mennie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Mennie, 805 A.2d 454, 174 N.J. 335, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 1290 (N.J. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 01-084, concluding that JOHN G. MENNIE of OCEAN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1986,- should be reprimanded for violating RPC 7.1(a)(1) (making false or misleading communications about a lawyer, the lawyer’s services or any matter in which the lawyer has or seeks a professional involvement) and RPC 7.1(a)(2) (making false or misleading communications likely to create an unjustified expectation about, results the lawyer can achieve), and said JOHN G. MENNIE having been ordered to show cause why he should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JOHN G. MENNIE is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

[336]*336ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 01-084, concluding that JOHN G. MENNIE of OCEAN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1986,- should be reprimanded for violating RPC 7.1(a)(1) (making false or misleading communications about a lawyer, the lawyer’s services or any matter in which the lawyer has or seeks a professional involvement) and RPC 7.1(a)(2) (making false or misleading communications likely to create an unjustified expectation about, results the lawyer can achieve), and said JOHN G. MENNIE having been ordered to show cause why he should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JOHN G. MENNIE is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

[336]*336ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

805 A.2d 454, 174 N.J. 335, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 1290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mennie-nj-2002.