In re Menhaji

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Menhaji

153 A.3d 241, 227 N.J. 627, 2017 WL 521781, 2017 N.J. LEXIS 157

DecidedFebruary 8, 2017

StatusPublished

This text of 153 A.3d 241 (In re Menhaji) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Menhaji, 153 A.3d 241, 227 N.J. 627, 2017 WL 521781, 2017 N.J. LEXIS 157 (N.J. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 16-057, concluding that the formal ethics complaint filed against AZAR ABASI MENHAJI of PATERSON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1997, should be [628]*628dismissed for lack of clear and convincing evidence of unethical conduct, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the formal complaint against AZAR ABASI MENHAJI in District Docket No. XI-2012-0015E is hereby dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 16-057, concluding that the formal ethics complaint filed against AZAR ABASI MENHAJI of PATERSON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1997, should be [628]*628dismissed for lack of clear and convincing evidence of unethical conduct, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the formal complaint against AZAR ABASI MENHAJI in District Docket No. XI-2012-0015E is hereby dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

153 A.3d 241, 227 N.J. 627, 2017 WL 521781, 2017 N.J. LEXIS 157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-menhaji-nj-2017.