In re Mencher

245 A.D. 381, 282 N.Y.S. 911
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 1, 1935·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

These proceedings were not properly brought. The order to show cause, together with the petition, was not served on any of the registered electors, nor a copy left for him as required by the direction of the court.

One order to show cause was served on the person in charge of the premises, with a mailed notice to each elector of intent to apply to have his name stricken from the rolls of voters. This was not in accord with the directions for service by the court. The petitions, too, are wholly on information and belief, without source or grounds shown. These are, therefore, entirely inadequate to justify striking out names of electors from the registry.

We think that the orders should be affirmed.

Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ.

In first proceeding: Order affirmed.

In second proceeding: Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Mencher, 245 A.D. 381, 282 N.Y.S. 911 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

245 A.D. 381 (In re Mencher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Delmont v. Kelly
172 A.D.2d 1067 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)