In re Melton
This text of 581 A.2d 788 (In re Melton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
On consideration of appellee’s petition for rehearing en banc, the response thereto, the motion to file transcript relevant to the petition for rehearing en banc, and the opposition thereto; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court, has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc, it is
ORDERED that the motion to file transcript relevant to the petition for rehearing en banc is granted and the Clerk is directed to file the lodged transcript. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that appellee’s petition for rehearing en banc is granted and that the opinion and judgment of November 6, 1989, 565 A.2d 635, are hereby vacated. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule this matter for argument before the court sitting en banc as soon as the calendar permits. Counsel are hereby directed to provide ten copies of the briefs heretofore filed to the Clerk on or before November 19, 1990.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
581 A.2d 788, 1990 D.C. App. LEXIS 311, 1990 WL 175025, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-melton-dc-1990.