In re Melograne

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Melograne

823 A.2d 140

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Melograne. Read the opinion of the Court — 571 Pa. 490 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 6, 2003·No. No. 820 Disciplinary Docket No. 3·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 6th day of May, 2003, A Rule having been entered by this Court on March 7, 2003, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing Julius C. Melograne to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension, upon consideration of the responses filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; Julius C. Melograne is placed on temporary suspension and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa. R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 6th day of May, 2003, A Rule having been entered by this Court on March 7, 2003, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing Julius C. Melograne to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension, upon consideration of the responses filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; Julius C. Melograne is placed on temporary suspension and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa. R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.

In re Melograne, 823 A.2d 140 (Pa. 2003).

Pincite

823 A.2d 140 (In re Melograne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.