in Re Melissa Sutton, Relator

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 5, 2012·No. 04-12-00786-CV·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-12-00786-CV

IN RE Melissa SUTTON

Original Mandamus Proceedings 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 5, 2012

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On November 21, 2012, relator Melissa Sutton filed a petition for writ of mandamus,

complaining of the trial court’s November 8, 2012 order appointing a receiver. However,

mandamus relief is only available to correct a clear abuse of discretion for which the relator has

no adequate remedy at law. See In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135 (Tex.

2004) (orig. proceeding); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig.

proceeding). Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code section 51.014(a)(1) permits an

interlocutory appeal from an order that appoints a receiver. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE

§ 51.014(a)(1); TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1 (in an accelerated appeal, the notice of appeal must be filed

within 20 days after the judgment or order is signed). Therefore, we conclude relator has failed

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 11-05-00128, styled Patricia Angell v. Melissa Sutton, pending in the 218th Judicial District Court, Karnes County, Texas, the Honorable Stella Saxon presiding. 04-12-00786-CV

to establish she lacks an adequate remedy by appeal. Accordingly, the petition for writ of

mandamus is DENIED. TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Melissa Sutton, Relator, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

in Re Melissa Sutton, Relator (in Re Melissa Sutton, Relator) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America
148 S.W.3d 124 (Texas Supreme Court, 2004)
Walker v. Packer
827 S.W.2d 833 (Texas Supreme Court, 1992)