In re Melissa M.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Melissa M.

290 A.D.2d 219, 735 N.Y.S.2d 752, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 281

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 3, 2002

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 290 A.D.2d 219 (In re Melissa M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Melissa M., 290 A.D.2d 219, 735 N.Y.S.2d 752, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 281 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from order, Family Court, New York County (George Jurow, J.), entered on or about March 27, 2000, deemed an appeal from a disposition of the same court and Judge, entered March 17, 2000, which purportedly denied her application to direct the New York City Department of Juvenile Justice to test her for pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases, and that appeal unanimously dismissed, without costs.

The disposition challenged on appeal is not found in the March 27, 2000 order purportedly on appeal, but in transcribed proceedings from March 17, 2000 never reduced to an order. Accordingly, the appeal is from a nonappealable paper (see, Matter of Palmer v Palmer, 284 AD2d 612, 613). Further, appellant has no appeal as of right (see, Family Ct Act § 1112), since the disposition is not found in “a final order or judgment” (see, Matter of Yamoussa M., 220 AD2d 138, 142). Concur— Nardelli, J.P., Williams, Andrias, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from order, Family Court, New York County (George Jurow, J.), entered on or about March 27, 2000, deemed an appeal from a disposition of the same court and Judge, entered March 17, 2000, which purportedly denied her application to direct the New York City Department of Juvenile Justice to test her for pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases, and that appeal unanimously dismissed, without costs.

The disposition challenged on appeal is not found in the March 27, 2000 order purportedly on appeal, but in transcribed proceedings from March 17, 2000 never reduced to an order. Accordingly, the appeal is from a nonappealable paper (see, Matter of Palmer v Palmer, 284 AD2d 612, 613). Further, appellant has no appeal as of right (see, Family Ct Act § 1112), since the disposition is not found in “a final order or judgment” (see, Matter of Yamoussa M., 220 AD2d 138, 142). Concur— Nardelli, J.P., Williams, Andrias, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

290 A.D.2d 219, 735 N.Y.S.2d 752, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 281, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-melissa-m-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack