in Re: Melissa Larsen

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 10, 2018·No. 05-18-00775-CV·Published

Opinion

DENY; and Opinion Filed July 10, 2018.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00775-CV

IN RE MELISSA LARSEN, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 101st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-05693

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Francis, Fillmore, and Stoddart Opinion by Justice Fillmore In this original proceeding, relator seeks a writ of mandamus directing the trial court to

enter relator’s confession of judgment as a final judgment. To be entitled to mandamus relief, a

relator must show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no

adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig.

proceeding). Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown she is entitled to

the relief requested. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 52.8(a) (the court must deny the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to

the relief sought).

/Robert M. Fillmore/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE JUSTICE

180775F.P05

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re: Melissa Larsen, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

in Re: Melissa Larsen (in Re: Melissa Larsen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America
148 S.W.3d 124 (Texas Supreme Court, 2004)