in Re: Melissa Larsen
Opinion
DENY; and Opinion Filed July 10, 2018.
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00775-CV
IN RE MELISSA LARSEN, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 101st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-05693
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Francis, Fillmore, and Stoddart Opinion by Justice Fillmore In this original proceeding, relator seeks a writ of mandamus directing the trial court to
enter relator’s confession of judgment as a final judgment. To be entitled to mandamus relief, a
relator must show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no
adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig.
proceeding). Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown she is entitled to
the relief requested. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 52.8(a) (the court must deny the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to
the relief sought).
/Robert M. Fillmore/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE JUSTICE
180775F.P05
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re: Melissa Larsen (in Re: Melissa Larsen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.