in Re: Melissa Larsen
This text of in Re: Melissa Larsen (in Re: Melissa Larsen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DENY; and Opinion Filed July 10, 2018.
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00775-CV
IN RE MELISSA LARSEN, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 101st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-05693
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Francis, Fillmore, and Stoddart Opinion by Justice Fillmore In this original proceeding, relator seeks a writ of mandamus directing the trial court to
enter relator’s confession of judgment as a final judgment. To be entitled to mandamus relief, a
relator must show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no
adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig.
proceeding). Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown she is entitled to
the relief requested. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 52.8(a) (the court must deny the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to
the relief sought).
/Robert M. Fillmore/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE JUSTICE 180775F.P05
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Melissa Larsen, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-melissa-larsen-texapp-2018.