in Re: Melissa Larsen

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 10, 2018
Docket05-18-00775-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Melissa Larsen (in Re: Melissa Larsen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Melissa Larsen, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

DENY; and Opinion Filed July 10, 2018.

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00775-CV

IN RE MELISSA LARSEN, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 101st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-05693

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Francis, Fillmore, and Stoddart Opinion by Justice Fillmore In this original proceeding, relator seeks a writ of mandamus directing the trial court to

enter relator’s confession of judgment as a final judgment. To be entitled to mandamus relief, a

relator must show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no

adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig.

proceeding). Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown she is entitled to

the relief requested. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 52.8(a) (the court must deny the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to

the relief sought).

/Robert M. Fillmore/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE JUSTICE 180775F.P05

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America
148 S.W.3d 124 (Texas Supreme Court, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Melissa Larsen, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-melissa-larsen-texapp-2018.