In Re Melancon

400 B.R. 521, 61 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1097, 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 410, 2009 WL 415695
CourtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Louisiana
DecidedFebruary 19, 2009
Docket08-10866
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 400 B.R. 521 (In Re Melancon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Melancon, 400 B.R. 521, 61 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1097, 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 410, 2009 WL 415695 (La. 2009).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DOUGLAS D. DODD, Bankruptcy Judge.

The standing chapter 13 trustee objected to confirmation of debtor Edward J. Melancon, Jr.’s Fourth Amended Plan as based on an incorrect calculation of disposable income due to his improper deduction for health care expenses. Because the debtor properly claimed his health care expenses, his computation of disposable income is correct and the trustee’s objection is overruled.

Applicable Law

Among the important changes introduced in the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 1 were provisions defining a debtor’s “current monthly income” (“CMI”) 2 and applying a “means test” to determine the propriety of chapter 7 relief. 11 U.S.C. § 707(b)(2). In chapter 13 cases the CMI is the starting point for deciding how much income a debtor must devote to paying the claims of unsecured creditors. Chapter 13 debtors with CMI above defined levels must complete the means test to determine the amount of their disposable income. The CMI also determines the period of time, either three or five years, during which the debtor must commit his disposable income to paying unsecured creditors.

More specifically, to confirm a chapter 13 plan, a debtor must commit all his projected disposable income received in the “applicable commitment period ... to make payments to unsecured creditors. ...” 11 U.S.C. § 1325(b)(1)(B). Section 1325(b)(2)(A) and (B) defines disposable income as “current monthly income received by the debtor ... less amounts reasonably necessary to be expended” on maintenance and support of the debtor or his dependents, charitable deductions and the debtor’s business, if applicable. In turn, Bankruptcy Code section 1325(b)(3) states that “[ajmounts reasonably necessary to be expended under paragraph (2) shall be determined in accordance with” 11 U.S.C. § 707(b)(2)(A) and (B) if the debtor has current monthly income that, when *523 multiplied by 12, is greater than the state median family income for a family of the same size or is, in other words, an above-median family income debtor. Finally, the “applicable commitment period” according to 11 U.S.C. § 1 325(b)(4)(A)(ii) is at least five years for a debtor (and spouse) with CMI, when multiplied by 12, that is above the state median.

Under section 707(b)(2)(A)(ii), monthly expenses that may be deducted from the CMI as “reasonably necessary” are “the debtor’s applicable monthly expense amounts specified under the National Standards and Local Standards, and the debtor’s actual monthly expenses for the Categories specified as Other Necessary Expenses issued by the Internal Revenue Service for the area in which the debtor resides.... ” (Emphasis added.) The Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) sets out in the Internal Revenue Manual 3 national and local standards for the following categories of expenses: food, clothing, household supplies, personal care, and miscellaneous expenses; utilities; housing charges; vehicle operation or public transportation; transportation ownership and lease expenses; and out-of-pocket health care expenses. IRM 5.15.1.8 and 1.9 (05-09-2008) (emphasis added). Debtors also may take deductions for other types of expenses the IRS deems necessary. 4 In the category of “Other Necessary Expenses” the IRS includes life insurance, educational expenses, dependent care, child care, court ordered support payments, job-related involuntary deductions, accounting and legal fees, charitable contributions, secured debt payments, unsecured debt payments, taxes, telephone services, student loans, internet service expenses, and amounts necessary to repay federal tax loans. IRM 5.15.1.10 (05-09-2008).

The IRS Manual’s monthly living expense deductions are incorporated into the means test form 5 in order to calculate a debtor’s disposable income, on which the debtor’s required plan payment is based. Means test form line 24B is for the debt- or’s out-of-pocket health care expenses. Those expenses are based on the national standard deduction as well as the number of members in the debtor’s household and whether they are over or under age 65. Line 36 of the form is entitled “Other Necessary Expenses: health care.” It calls for the debtor to deduct from his CMI the average monthly amount the debtor actually expended for health care “that is not reimbursed by insurance or paid by a health savings account, and that is in excess of the amount entered in Line (Emphasis added.)

Facts

This debtor is married with two children, and according to his amended means test form, the debtor’s family income is above the state median. As a result he was required to complete the means test form to determine his monthly disposable income. On line 24B of the form, Melan-con claimed $228, the national standard allowance for out-of-pocket health care expenses for a household of four people. *524 The debtor listed $0 on line 36 of the form, which calls for a deduction for unreim-bursed health care expenses in excess of the amount claimed on line 24B.

The debtor also listed $228 in medical expenses on Schedule J, “Current Expenditures of Individual Debtors.” That schedule requires an estimate of several categories of the debtor’s “average or projected” monthly household expenses. At the trustee’s request, Melaneon submitted documentation for recent medical expenses averaging $167, though he did not docu.ment any anticipated medical expenses.

Melancon’s amended means test at line 59 reflects that his monthly disposable income is $25.78. This figure multiplied by 60 (five years, the “applicable commitment period” for a debtor with family income above the state median) totals $1,546.80, which is the minimum that debtor’s proposed plan must pay unsecured creditors to be confirmable. See 11 U.S.C. § 1325(b)(4)(A)(ii). The debtor’s Fourth Amended Plan proposes to pay unsecured creditors the total of $3,701.34, more than double the required minimum.

Analysis

The chapter 13 trustee urges the court to conclude that Melaneon cannot use the national standard IRS health care deduction for his projected health care expense on Schedule J or for purposes of determining the disposable income he must apply to plan payments, because his recent documented health care expenses are lower than the national standard for those expenses. The debtor argues that his use of the standard deduction on both the means test form and Schedule J is a reasonable and appropriate method of predicting future health care expenses in calculating his disposable income.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Uhlig
504 B.R. 916 (E.D. Wisconsin, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
400 B.R. 521, 61 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1097, 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 410, 2009 WL 415695, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-melancon-lamb-2009.