In re Meinhardt

Appellate Court of Illinois

In re Meinhardt

202 Ill. App. 266, 1916 Ill. App. LEXIS 911

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedDecember 19, 1916

DocketGen. No. 21,879

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 202 Ill. App. 266 (In re Meinhardt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Meinhardt, 202 Ill. App. 266, 1916 Ill. App. LEXIS 911 (Ill. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Execution, § 295*—what is not conclusive as to whether malice was gist of action. The mere fact that the statement of claim, filed in an action in which a capias ad satisfaciendum issued, does not disclose that malice was of the gist of the action does not entitle an insolvent debtor to release from imprisonment under such an execution, since the evidence offered on the trial may have been sufficient to support the judgment on which the capias was issued.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Execution, § 295*—what is not conclusive as to whether malice was gist of action. The mere fact that the statement of claim, filed in an action in which a capias ad satisfaciendum issued, does not disclose that malice was of the gist of the action does not entitle an insolvent debtor to release from imprisonment under such an execution, since the evidence offered on the trial may have been sufficient to support the judgment on which the capias was issued.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

202 Ill. App. 266, 1916 Ill. App. LEXIS 911, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-meinhardt-illappct-1916.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack