Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/In re Meaney

In re Meaney

785 S.E.2d 304, 298 Ga. 854, 2016 WL 1391299, 2016 Ga. LEXIS 269
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedApril 6, 2016
DocketS16Y0034
StatusPublished

This text of 785 S.E.2d 304 (In re Meaney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Meaney, 785 S.E.2d 304, 298 Ga. 854, 2016 WL 1391299, 2016 Ga. LEXIS 269 (Ga. 2016).

Opinion

Per curiam.

The Court having reviewed the Notice of Compliance with Conditions submitted by the Office of the General Counsel of the State Bar of Georgia, and it appearing that James A. Meaney III has complied with all of the conditions for reinstatement following his suspension by this Court, see In the Matter of Meaney, 298 Ga. 136 (779 SE2d 662) (2015), it is hereby ordered that James A. Meaney III be reinstated to the practice of law in the State of Georgia.

Reinstated.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Meaney
779 S.E.2d 662 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
785 S.E.2d 304, 298 Ga. 854, 2016 WL 1391299, 2016 Ga. LEXIS 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-meaney-ga-2016.