In re McR. Children

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re McR. Children

182 A.D.2d 357, 585 N.Y.S.2d 694, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5564

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 2, 1992

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 182 A.D.2d 357 (In re McR. Children) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re McR. Children, 182 A.D.2d 357, 585 N.Y.S.2d 694, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5564 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Orders, Family Court, New York County (Mary E. Bednar, J.), entered on or about July 3, July 25, October 11, and October 15,1990, which denied appellant’s motion to hold petitioner in contempt, denied appellant’s motion to dismiss the extension of placement petition for, and extending placement of, Darrick M. for 12 months, and denied appellant’s motion to dismiss the extension of supervision of Theone A. for 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Application by appellant’s assigned counsel to withdraw is granted (see, Matter of Wise Servs. [White], 131 AD2d 306). We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no non-frivolous points which could be [358]*358raised on appeal. We have considered appellant’s pro se brief and find that there is no merit to the issues raised therein. There is no basis to find petitioner in contempt for failing to comply with the court order since it was appellant who largely prevented compliance therewith. Moreover, the issues concerning the extension of placement and supervision are moot. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Carro, Wallach, Ross and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Orders, Family Court, New York County (Mary E. Bednar, J.), entered on or about July 3, July 25, October 11, and October 15,1990, which denied appellant’s motion to hold petitioner in contempt, denied appellant’s motion to dismiss the extension of placement petition for, and extending placement of, Darrick M. for 12 months, and denied appellant’s motion to dismiss the extension of supervision of Theone A. for 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Application by appellant’s assigned counsel to withdraw is granted (see, Matter of Wise Servs. [White], 131 AD2d 306). We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no non-frivolous points which could be [358]*358raised on appeal. We have considered appellant’s pro se brief and find that there is no merit to the issues raised therein. There is no basis to find petitioner in contempt for failing to comply with the court order since it was appellant who largely prevented compliance therewith. Moreover, the issues concerning the extension of placement and supervision are moot. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Carro, Wallach, Ross and Rubin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

182 A.D.2d 357, 585 N.Y.S.2d 694, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mcr-children-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack