In re McPhee

209 F. 143, 1913 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1102
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania·Decided November 29, 1913·No. No. 9,886·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

THOMPSON, District Judge.

The objection of the Naturalization Examiner to the granting of the petition for naturalization in this case raises the identical questions considered by Judge Orr in the Western district of Pennsylvania in the case of In re Schmidt, 207 Fed. 678. Aside from the desirability of conformity with the decisions of the courts in this circuit, I entirely concur in the reasoning and conclusions of Judge Orr in .that case, in which Judge Young concurred.

It is therefore ordered that the prayer of the petition be granted. The petitioner may be admitted to citizenship on taking the proper oath at a naturalization hearing in this court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re McPhee, 209 F. 143, 1913 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1102 (E.D. Pa. 1913).

209 F. 143 (In re McPhee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Linklater v. Perkins
74 F.2d 473 (D.C. Circuit, 1934)
Fanariotis v. United States
63 F.2d 352 (Third Circuit, 1933)
In re Krausse
36 F.2d 407 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1929)
In re Fanariotis
33 F.2d 313 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1929)
In re Wieg
30 F.2d 418 (S.D. Texas, 1929)
In re Cassovel
33 F.2d 1002 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1927)
In Re Olsen
18 F.2d 425 (N.D. California, 1927)
In re Krocsko
26 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 95 (Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court, 1926)
In re Linklater
3 F.2d 691 (N.D. California, 1925)
Ex parte Eberhardt
270 F. 334 (E.D. Missouri, 1921)
United States v. Ness
230 F. 950 (Eighth Circuit, 1916)