In re McNeal

District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided July 16, 2026·No. 26-BG-0526·Published

Opinion

Notice: This order is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 26-BG-0526

IN RE DONNELL H. MCNEAL, ESQUIRE, Respondent.

A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals DDN: 2026-D023 Bar Registration No. 974077 BDN: 26-BD-039

BEFORE: Easterly and Shanker, Associate Judges, and Glickman, Senior Judge.

ORDER

(FILED—July 16, 2026)

On consideration of the affidavit of respondent Donnell H. McNeal in which he consents to his disbarment; the report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility; and the Board’s unopposed motion for leave to file under seal Disciplinary Counsel’s lodged motion to accept respondent’s consent to disbarment, which includes as an attachment his affidavit consenting to disbarment; it is

ORDERED that respondent Donnell H. McNeal is hereby disbarred by consent. See D.C. Bar R. XI, § 12(a). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Board’s motion to file under seal is granted, and the Clerk shall file the lodged documents under seal. See id. § 12(c). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that respondent’s attention is drawn to the requirements relating to disbarred attorneys, including the filing of the required affidavit, and to the provisions relating to eligibility for reinstatement. See id. §§ 14, 16. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall publish this order and transmit a copy thereof to respondent, Disciplinary Counsel, and the Board.

PER CURIAM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re McNeal, (D.C. 2026).

In re McNeal (In re McNeal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.