In re McManus
This text of 432 N.E.2d 601 (In re McManus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On summary consideration, order affirmed, with costs. We agree with the Appellate Division that “[ajpplying fundamental principles of contract law, it is apparent that the petitioner’s letter of December 14,1979 was an unqualified, seasonable expression of acceptance of appellant’s offer of stock at a price to be computed in accordance with [857]*857the formula contained in the shareholders’ agreements” (83 AD2d 553; see Martin Delicatessen v Schumacher, 52 NY2d 105, 110; 1 Corbin, Contracts, §§ 97-98).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer. Taking no part: Judge Jones.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
432 N.E.2d 601, 55 N.Y.2d 855, 447 N.Y.S.2d 708, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3064, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mcmanus-ny-1982.