In re McManus

624 F. App'x 105
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 14, 2015·No. No. 15-1919·Published

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tony Waddle McManus petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court has issued its final order and judgment on the § 2255 motion. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided McManus’ case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented [106] in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re McManus, 624 F. App'x 105 (4th Cir. 2015).

624 F. App'x 105 (In re McManus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related