In re McMahon
244 A.D. 846
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 15, 1935
StatusPublished
This text of 244 A.D. 846 (In re McMahon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re McMahon, 244 A.D. 846 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).
Opinion
Carl L. McMahon is reinstated as an attorney and counselor at law. Hill, P, J., Rhodes, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ., concur; McNamee, J., dissents on the ground that the order of suspension required the character committee to report that the conduct of the applicant was good during the period of suspenion. That they have not done.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
244 A.D. 846, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mcmahon-nyappdiv-1935.