in Re: M.C.M
This text of in Re: M.C.M (in Re: M.C.M) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed April 7, 2005.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-05-00021-CV
IN RE M.C.M., Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On January 13, 2005, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov=t. Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. Relator challenges the trial court=s December 8, 2004, order which requires relator to sign authorizations for disclosure of medical records. The authorizations direct the various entities in possession of the medical records to release the records to Keais Records Service Inc. and the records are to be brought to the trial court, placed under seal and reviewed by the trial court in camera.
Relator has not established that he is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator=s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed April 7, 2005.
Panel consists of Justices Anderson, Hudson, and Frost.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: M.C.M, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mcm-texapp-2005.