In re McKisson
This text of 1 Bur. 118 (In re McKisson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It seems objections were made to the bankrupt’s discharge on the ground, that he had'not scheduled and given up to the assignee, for the benefit of his creditors, certain improvements on the public lands of the United States. Upon this question, the Court said:
The Court does not conceive the improvements on the public lands, as mentioned in the assignee’s report herein, to be such an interest as can be passed to, or vested in, the assignee for the benefit of the creditors of the bankrupt.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Bur. 118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mckisson-wis-1842.