In re McKesson

D.C. Circuit

In re McKesson

11 F.2d 999, 56 App. D.C. 401, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2653

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedApril 5, 1926

DocketPatent Appeal No. 1813

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 11 F.2d 999 (In re McKesson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re McKesson, 11 F.2d 999, 56 App. D.C. 401, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2653 (D.C. Cir. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents, refusing claims Nos. 43 to 49, inclusive, in appellant’s reissue application, because they do not properly read upon his disclosure, and because he is estopped to make them in a reissue application, he having canceled from his original application claims of substantially the same scope.

We have carefully examined the record and brief of appellant, in the light of his oral argument, and are content to rest our opinion upon the decisions of the Patent Office. The decision is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents, refusing claims Nos. 43 to 49, inclusive, in appellant’s reissue application, because they do not properly read upon his disclosure, and because he is estopped to make them in a reissue application, he having canceled from his original application claims of substantially the same scope.

We have carefully examined the record and brief of appellant, in the light of his oral argument, and are content to rest our opinion upon the decisions of the Patent Office. The decision is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 F.2d 999, 56 App. D.C. 401, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2653, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mckesson-cadc-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack