In re McKesson

D.C. Circuit

In re McKesson

11 F.2d 999, 56 App. D.C. 401, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2653

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided April 5, 1926·No. Patent Appeal No. 1813·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents, refusing claims Nos. 43 to 49, inclusive, in appellant’s reissue application, because they do not properly read upon his disclosure, and because he is estopped to make them in a reissue application, he having canceled from his original application claims of substantially the same scope.

We have carefully examined the record and brief of appellant, in the light of his oral argument, and are content to rest our opinion upon the decisions of the Patent Office. The decision is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents, refusing claims Nos. 43 to 49, inclusive, in appellant’s reissue application, because they do not properly read upon his disclosure, and because he is estopped to make them in a reissue application, he having canceled from his original application claims of substantially the same scope.

We have carefully examined the record and brief of appellant, in the light of his oral argument, and are content to rest our opinion upon the decisions of the Patent Office. The decision is affirmed.

Affirmed.

In re McKesson, 11 F.2d 999, 56 App. D.C. 401, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2653 (D.C. Cir. 1926).

Pincite

11 F.2d 999 (In re McKesson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related