In re McKenna

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re McKenna

303 A.D.2d 774, 755 N.Y.S.2d 320, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2192

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 4, 2003

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 303 A.D.2d 774 (In re McKenna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re McKenna, 303 A.D.2d 774, 755 N.Y.S.2d 320, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2192 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

—Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1990. He maintains an office for .the practice of law in New Jersey, where he was admitted in 1989.

By order dated June 27, 2002, the Supreme Court of New Jersey publicly reprimanded respondent for failure to abide by a client’s decision and for failure to act with reasonable dili[775]*775gence and promptness in representation of the client. Respondent consented to the discipline.

Petitioner moves for an order imposing reciprocal discipline upon respondent (see 22 NYCRR 806.19). Respondent has not replied to the motion.

Under the circumstances presented, we grant petitioner’s motion and reciprocally censure respondent (see e.g. Matter of Mahoney, 166 AD2d 869 [1990]).

Mercure, J.P., Peters, Spain, Carpinello and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that petitioner’s motion is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is censured.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI