In re McKenna

840 P.2d 412, 251 Kan. 615, 1992 Kan. LEXIS 207
CourtSupreme Court of Kansas
DecidedOctober 8, 1992
DocketNo. 66,150
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 840 P.2d 412 (In re McKenna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re McKenna, 840 P.2d 412, 251 Kan. 615, 1992 Kan. LEXIS 207 (kan 1992).

Opinion

On July 12, 1991, this court placed respondent on probation for a period of one year subject to the following conditions: (1) that he perform 50 hours of pro bono legal services, (2) that he not possess or use any controlled substance, as defined in K.S.A. 1990 Supp. 65-4101(e), (3) that he submit to random drug tests, at his expense, and (4) that he attend Narcotics Anonymous meetings on a regular basis. In re McKenna, 249 Kan. 215, 216, 813 P.2d 929 (1991).

This court finds that the disciplinary administrator has filed a probation report verifying that respondent has fully complied with all conditions imposed upon him by this court and recommending that respondent be discharged from probation.

It Is Therefore Ordered that respondent is discharged from probation and from any further obligations in this matter and that this proceeding is closed.

It Is Further Ordered that this order shall be published in the Kansas Reports and that the costs herein be assessed to the respondent.

Dated this 8th day of October, 1992.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Walton
630 A.2d 990 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
840 P.2d 412, 251 Kan. 615, 1992 Kan. LEXIS 207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mckenna-kan-1992.