In re McGovern

118 N.Y.S. 378
New York Surrogate's Court·Decided August 15, 1908·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

THOMAS, S.

No copy of the chattel mortgage dated August .

26, 1903, executed by the intestate, having1 been filed, as. required "by law, the chattel mortgage was void as against the administratrix in so far as she represented the creditors of the deceased, although it was valid as against his next of kin. The administratrix will be surcharged with the sum of $2,200 as the value of the personal property sold under the chattel mortgage, which it was her duty to contest for the preservation of the estate. The rental value of the premises occupied by the deceased at the date of his death was $1,800, and no more. The referee has no power to pass upon the question of allowances, costs, and taxable disbursements, and to that extent the exception to conclusion of law No. 20 is sustained.

Except as modified, referee’s report is confirmed, and the exceptions thereto overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re McGovern, 118 N.Y.S. 378 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1908).

118 N.Y.S. 378 (In re McGovern) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Theisen v. Hoey
51 A.2d 61 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1947)
In re the Estate of Shay
157 Misc. 615 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1935)
Beebe v. Prime
99 Misc. 668 (New York Supreme Court, 1917)