In re McG.
This text of 68 A.D.3d 1118 (In re McG.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[1119]*1119Under the circumstances of this case, we deem it appropriate for the petitioner to pay a one-third share of the fee for the legal services performed by the court evaluator in this matter, rather than the entire amount of the fee (see Mental Hygiene Law § 81.09 [f]).
The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Rivera, J.E, Florio, Belen and Austin, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
68 A.D.3d 1118, 890 N.Y.2d 345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mcg-nyappdiv-2009.