In re McEnerney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re McEnerney

71 A.D.2d 612, 418 N.Y.S.2d 558, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12828

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 2, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 71 A.D.2d 612 (In re McEnerney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re McEnerney, 71 A.D.2d 612, 418 N.Y.S.2d 558, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12828 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

In an application by a disbarred attorney for reinstatement as an attorney and counselor at law, the matter was referred to the Committee on Character and Fitness for the Second Judicial Department for investigation, hearing and report by order of this court dated November 16, 1970, the application to be held in abeyance. The committee’s report has been received by this court. The committee has found that this petitioner presently possesses the requisite character and fitness for an attorney and counselor at law and this court adopts and confirms said finding. Application granted; petitioner’s name is [613]*613ordered restored to the roll of attorneys and counselors at law forthwith. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Damiani, Titone and Suozzi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an application by a disbarred attorney for reinstatement as an attorney and counselor at law, the matter was referred to the Committee on Character and Fitness for the Second Judicial Department for investigation, hearing and report by order of this court dated November 16, 1970, the application to be held in abeyance. The committee’s report has been received by this court. The committee has found that this petitioner presently possesses the requisite character and fitness for an attorney and counselor at law and this court adopts and confirms said finding. Application granted; petitioner’s name is [613]*613ordered restored to the roll of attorneys and counselors at law forthwith. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Damiani, Titone and Suozzi, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 A.D.2d 612, 418 N.Y.S.2d 558, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12828, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mcenerney-nyappdiv-1979.