In re McDowall
9 A.D.3d 915, 779 N.Y.S.2d 397, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9505
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 9, 2004
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 9 A.D.3d 915 (In re McDowall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re McDowall, 9 A.D.3d 915, 779 N.Y.S.2d 397, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9505 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).
Opinion
Order entered denying reinstatement with leave to renew application upon submis[916]*916sion of proof of compliance with rule 1022.28 (22 NYCRR 1022.28) and satisfaction of outstanding attorney registration fees. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Hayes, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In re McDowall
33 A.D.3d 246 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
9 A.D.3d 915, 779 N.Y.S.2d 397, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9505, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mcdowall-nyappdiv-2004.