In re McDowall
9 A.D.3d 915, 779 N.Y.S.2d 397, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9505
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 9, 2004·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Order entered denying reinstatement with leave to renew application upon submis[916]*916sion of proof of compliance with rule 1022.28 (22 NYCRR 1022.28) and satisfaction of outstanding attorney registration fees. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Hayes, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re McDowall, 9 A.D.3d 915, 779 N.Y.S.2d 397, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9505 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).
9 A.D.3d 915 (In re McDowall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re McDowall
33 A.D.3d 246 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)