In re McDonald

60 So. 3d 602, 2011 La. LEXIS 949, 2011 WL 1642774
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided April 29, 2011·No. No. 2011-B-0706·Published

Opinion

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS.

PER CURIAM.*

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that converted client funds to her own use, neglected a legal matter, and failed to communicate with a client. Following the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Triscelyn Landor McDonald, Louisiana Bar Roll number 24507, be suspended from the practice of law for one year and one day.1 It is further ordered that re[603] spondent make restitution to Samantha Brown in the amount of $7,800.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty-days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re McDonald, 60 So. 3d 602, 2011 La. LEXIS 949, 2011 WL 1642774 (La. 2011).

60 So. 3d 602 (In re McDonald) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Harris
745 So. 2d 1172 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1999)
In re Welcome
840 So. 2d 519 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2003)