In re McDermott

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re McDermott

253 A.D. 200, 1 N.Y.S.2d 681, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8394

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 28, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 253 A.D. 200 (In re McDermott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re McDermott, 253 A.D. 200, 1 N.Y.S.2d 681, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8394 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

On November 17, 1937, the respondent was duly convicted in the Court of General Sessions of the County of New York of the crime of grand larceny in the first degree, which crime is a felony. Pursuant to section 477 and subdivision 3 of section 88 of the Judiciary Law, he, therefore, must be disbarred.

Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.

Respondent disbarred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

On November 17, 1937, the respondent was duly convicted in the Court of General Sessions of the County of New York of the crime of grand larceny in the first degree, which crime is a felony. Pursuant to section 477 and subdivision 3 of section 88 of the Judiciary Law, he, therefore, must be disbarred.

Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.

Respondent disbarred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

253 A.D. 200, 1 N.Y.S.2d 681, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mcdermott-nyappdiv-1938.